I see both sides here and I think the offense to some, is that this was a good show, and yet the reviewer chose to dwell on the negative. Yes he mentioned a lot of the good, and if the previous two nights hadn't been above average then I'd say the tone would be appropriate. I don't want a fluff review, but the weekend was a win, and this review comes off otherwise. There have been decent shows so far but we achieved liftoff this weekend, a solid 3 day run. I don't see too many comments that came across as being personally attacked by this. I think some agree there could've been a more fair approach to it- sure there were flubs but hot damn there were some ups as well, and more importantly, they are heating up for what should be a smokin tour closer and incredible festival. Why is it the reviewer can spend too much time critiquing the band, but when a lot of people critique the review some people say fuck off in the form of "phish.net isn't for you"?