Wednesday 07/20/2011 by pzerbo

SBIX ESSAY - @FATNESS1

Posted by @fatness1 in the SBIX Essay Contest.

Every Phish review must be prefaced with an introduction of the writer to place his perspective into the appropriate context for the reader. I am 31 years old, have been to 71 shows since 1996 (+/- 4 since I can no longer say with absolute certainty whether I was at a particular show), 6 of the 9 festivals (with regrettable absences from Clifford, Went and 8), I walked down the wedding aisle to Tweezer Reprise, I believe that if I ever ascend to heaven and God permits me to select the music I will pick the Reba jam, and after hearing Forbin’s this weekend, I can affirmatively state that I have just about heard everything in the catalogue.

Myself and 3 of my closest friends who love Phish made a decision a few months ago to leave our wives and children at home for what might be “one last hurrah” at the Super Ball. My thought process was that I had seen the band so many times, some good, some not as good, that I no longer needed to drive across the country and reshuffle my life around their tour schedule.

Before I get into the bulk of my Super Ball experience, I’ll just go Tarantino style and tell you the ending - - I have to continue to enjoy the Phish experience for the rest of my life and there is no way I am done- - maybe not as frequently, but I still need it. Just when I thought I was at another place in my life, the music and the friendship again tapped an energy in my soul that rejuvenated it from the daily grind of life and reminded me why a Phish show is about the overall experience and transcends whether or not the Stash was a little off or the song selection was appropriate for that point in the set.

So with that backhanded slap to all the other reviewers who dissect every note of the show, I am going to flat out state that this was the single best Phish show/experience I personally have ever had. And I can only speak for my own experience. Was it the best they have ever played? I don’t know. I’m not a good enough musician or a big enough snob to say whether or not they were musically perfect. After all, chances are that in my years of shows, I was probably making doody in a porta-potty while they were playing their greatest note ever. Conversely, there have definitely been times when I was rocking out like a maniac while they were playing their worst. The truth is that every Phish fans’ opinion is predicated upon a singularly unique experience affected by a long-list of variables, including: sight and sound quality at seats; company of friends; your toxicological rollercoaster; personal song preference; CMI (your “crotch moisture index,” in which scientific studies have shown that high levels of CMI can lead to seriously diminished levels of fun); the presence of a horribly smelling hippie next to you or a 6-year old kid that makes you feel weird and wonder whether you can light up; etc. For me, this weekend at the Glen, I had the perfect blend of all of those factors including an exceptionally low CMI due to recent weight loss and the fact that I showered everyday. So with that all out of the way, here is what I gathered from this weekend:

No band in the world goes to greater lengths to provide their fans with something that is as close to a utopian musical experience as humanly possible. I have sat in at least 12 hours of traffic for all of the prior festivals - - Phish clearly worked on that; I have trekked through mud and rain - - Phish stopped the rain (Trey even acknowledged his ability to do so); I have walked away from 1:02 minute sets in which they were clearly not all of sound mind - - they worked on that and rocked for close to 2 hours every set this weekend; I have suffered through every other inconvenience imaginable - - they no longer exist at these festivals. And why is that - - because of the efforts of Phish and its management. The creation of the entire experience is their true gift and why I am grateful as a fan. As for my particular experience this weekend, well here it is:

My 3 friends and I: stayed at a hotel 5 miles away (shout out to the Glen Motor Inn); got cab rides from a mother and daughter named Pitter and Patty who dropped us off at the gate and were waiting for us every night (even after I pushed her back to 3:30 a.m. for the Storage Set); took showers after the shows (not together although there’s nothing wrong with that); went to a brewery; swam in a lake; ran in a hamster wheel; fell in a hamster wheel; went to a concert that had a hamster wheel???; threw a football; grilled tons of delicious meat; drank a lot of Jack; smoked way too many cigs; tried to figure out whether we could distinguish girl poo from boy poo in a porta-potty (I hypothesized that girl poo comes out with a pink bow); determined that the secret to life and festival survival is peeing clearly to establish you are properly hydrated; came up with an idea for a movie where every man on Earth is given the ability to zap a woman’s clothes off with his eyes (there is a rub here - - you can only use your gift once in your whole life so you better really think about when you would “use it”); the societal ramifications of this gift (whether it convinces women to wear fewer clothes because maybe they would realize that they are less likely to be zapped if they were already scantily clad); a new rule that if you “use it” on a girl who is underage, then it reverses and the user’s own clothes instantly vaporize; the appropriate definition of “underage;” whether a man who has not “used it” can leave his gift in his Last Will and Testament for his next of kin; whether we can get Jennifer Aniston and Vince Vaughn to star in a rom-com called “Using It” where Vince Vaughn falls in love with Jennifer, and even though he can “use it” on anyone in the whole world, he decides at the very end to “use it” on her at which point she responds “You didn’t have to” and he whispers back “I know… I wanted to;” and how much fun it is to now turn to your friend when you see a cute girl and say “used it” (or even funnier on an ugly one).

On top of all these events and jokes, I do recall that they actually played some music this weekend. Please do not take this diatribe as my claim that it does not even matter what the band plays. The bottom line is that all 8 sets were uniquely memorable. I can look at each set and tell you exactly what I did and where I was on the grounds - - that’s how I know the entire show was great. I appreciated them giving Page a lot of spotlight the first two days (I can’t lie, I was dying for a Coil). But, the last set of the weekend was my personal favorite - - the Big Balls opener was the most fun song I have ever heard them play (Fishman does a damn good AC/DC), DWD captured the mood, No Quarter blew my mind, it certainly was Party Time, I love me a dirty Ghost> Jibboo> Light> Waves, Whats the Use? is gorgeous, Meatstick is a far better song than people give it credit for, and Stealing Time is the second best song they have written in the last 10 years (with Mexican Cousin being the best - - wait, am I kidding?). And you thought it was YEM or Fluff or Slave time? Bullocks!

Now, one more pot shot at the Mr. Miner’s of the world. Yeah, that’s you people complaining you didn’t love the Bug/Joy towards the end of Day 1, Set 2. Hasn’t this band earned the right to play whatever they feel like when they have gone to such incredible lengths to please us? Didn’t you notice that they cut Time Turns from the rotation (which Trey should not give up on, he should just rework certain parts of the song which are pretty cool like when the Dead cut Let it Grow off the end to make it a separate song)? Does every song have to be the rager that you like to hear? Would it kill you to go grab a water and pee clearly during the songs you don’t love? I think my biggest annoyance was people complaining about the “boring” Storage Set. 5 sets of loud tunes wasn’t enough for you? For the first time ever, Phish allowed its fans to hear what it may be like when they are alone in the Barn and playing what they want and experimenting without worrying about what the crowd wants to hear. So when they jam ambiently for an hour, sit down and enjoy it, and stop wishing that they may bust something out that you have probably heard 16 times already. Or just “use it” because that’s really fun.

So what is the central theme of this everlasting spoof? I guess my point is that the essence of Phish is not just about what and how they play, but its about creating an overall energy, emotion and experience, and that is what they did this weekend. I think a lot of people look at Phish’s music as that of a painting created by an artist. I do not. I believe that Phish’s music is really just the paintbrush, and the artwork is the overall creation within the community and on the festival grounds. It’s all connected, it’s all a circle, it’s a giant ball - - it truly was a Super Ball.

If you liked this blog post, one way you could "like" it is to make a donation to The Mockingbird Foundation, the sponsor of Phish.net. Support music education for children, and you just might change the world.


Comments

, comment by batshitcrazy
batshitcrazy Exactly, thank you so much!!@
, comment by thebubba
thebubba This is spot on. I have not had a chance to review SB9 and I really don't review the music. It was great, but more importantly, for me going solo to SB9, it brought together some euphoric feelings. As I sense from some netters, many of us have families. For me SB9 came at a perfect time as 1 of our 3 kids had left for Europe on 7/1. On Sunday, our youngest daughter (12) left for a summer camp about an hour and half from Watkins Glen. I drove up to meet her and my wife at the camp for drop off. Our daughter was so thrilled to back at camp, and as I left there (as other parents will attest), it is a beautiful feeling when your kids are happy - it is such a great high. Anyway, my drive back to the Glen reminded me of the euphoric feeling I had to Antelope and Mike's Groove at Alpine 1 in 2010, with our other daughter (15) for her first Phish show. I felt like I was soaring somewhere high above on such a natural high (digging Phish with our 15 year old was beyond words). So, I get back to the Glen in time for day 3 to be blown away by day 3's set list and the Forbin/Mockingbird and the rest of the songs. If anyone saw me, I just was smiling ear to ear all of Sunday, lost in a trance of euphoria induced by my real family and Phish. I can tell you that feeling is beyond priceless. Mix that in with riding my bike around the Watkins Glen hills over 4 days, well, I have left my SB9 wristband on to continue to remind me of what I was lucky to experience. Thanks.
, comment by Fluffyfluffyhead
Fluffyfluffyhead YES! great job!!
, comment by RabeldyNugs
RabeldyNugs Awesome essay @pzerbo and your writing came through really well and it's always very nice to hear some good vibes going around, thanks for spreading it.
, comment by RabeldyNugs
RabeldyNugs Whoops, I guess you are @fatness1, which is just funny.
, comment by PhunkPhan
PhunkPhan I agree whole heartedly. Too much can be made of the technical qualities of the music or the song selection. This was one truly great weekend. From pulling alongside the PhootDoctor and Looper John who were the greatest tent neighbors you could ask for. The ability to go to the car between sets and even take a shower! The Runaway Jim 5k with a big shout out to the guy running with a Sousaphone; the balls to kick off song one, set one, night one; the weather and finally .........The Monkey Man!!
This was without a doubt 3 of the greatest days. I would go back to Watkins Glen in a heartbeat. Have a smile just thinking about it........
, comment by Commander_Riker
Commander_Riker Very good essay my friend. It comments brilliantly and indirectly on your maturity as a phan of this band through the years. Our viewpoint changes with maturity. Younger folks tend to be more scrutinizing in these days. Years ago, every show was killer because we were younger, and so was the band.
, comment by andrewmorrison12
andrewmorrison12 right on
, comment by MinerHater
MinerHater Mr. Miner is such a hater.
, comment by kenny_powers
kenny_powers "Now, one more pot shot at the Mr. Miner’s of the world. Yeah, that’s you people complaining you didn’t love the Bug/Joy towards the end of Day 1, Set 2. Hasn’t this band earned the right to play whatever they feel like when they have gone to such incredible lengths to please us?"

um, i don't see how someone saying they personally didn't love a song or segment of show equates to them not thinking the band hasn't earned the right to play whatever they want. different strokes, you know? while i see your point (and agree) about living in the moment and enjoying the uniqueness of that song at that time in that place, every phan has their own likes and dislikes when it comes to specific tunes and/or placement of those tunes.

just saying you shouldn't generalize the "Mr. Miners of the world".
, comment by ericwyman
ericwyman @fatness1 said:
"Now, one more pot shot at the Mr. Miner’s of the world. Yeah, that’s you people complaining you didn’t love the Bug/Joy towards the end of Day 1, Set 2. Hasn’t this band earned the right to play whatever they feel like when they have gone to such incredible lengths to please us?
Moreover it's not accurate.

+1 to @Kenny_powers for calling out the over-generalization and applying it to an individual.
, comment by simoncan
simoncan It's irritating when people overemphasize technical flubs, but I don't think Mr. Miner is that kind of critic. He gets excited when songs and jams move outside typical boundaries, he considers the flow of music within a set, and like everyone else he has favorite/ less favorite songs. And what I especially appreciate about Miner is that he takes time to describe the music. Much less interesting, in my opinion, are the reviews like above that say little beyond, "No Quarter blew my mind," and "Stealing Time is the second best song they have written in the last 10 years." Maybe those things are true, but they tell me nothing about the show.

, comment by concertconfessions
concertconfessions I only read this because Mr. Miner is crying on Twitter. One would think he was a lil girl who skinned his knee on the playground with the amount of tears coming out of that holier than thou bag of dick. This is a great read and the author makes a solid point about the band playing what they want. Phish gives us more than any other major band on the planet (you don't see Linkin Park taking requests via crowd signs now do you?) and if that means I hear TTE 4 shows in a row, at least in 2011 I got 4 shows in a row.
, comment by simoncan
simoncan @concertconfessions said:
that holier than thou bag of dick.
Why do you hate the guy so much? I think his blog is an interesting read.
, comment by deeyoo75
deeyoo75 I like to use it use it.
I like to use it use it.
, comment by OnlinePhishTour
OnlinePhishTour joy is a shitty set closer.
, comment by Jamman711
Jamman711 "you don't see Linkin Park taking requests via crowd signs now do you?"

Put the signs down unless they say please don't throw glowsticks.
, comment by voopa
voopa @concertconfessions said:
holier than thou bag of dick.

Obviously you have never met this kind gentleman.
, comment by tripledouble
tripledouble Well written. You have encapsulated many thoughts that I have had over the last 3 years. Way to keep it positive.......and you're right about staying hydrated. I also agree that not every song has to be your favorite face melting rager. For people who have been to many shows and heard many songs many times it's nice to hear the subtle bad-assness of a different song in a different way.

In regards to song selection I've recently realized that whatever makes the band happy makes me happy.
, comment by bankmeister
bankmeister Mr. Reginald Denny to the courtesy phone, please. Mr. Reginald Denny...
, comment by stuphoria
stuphoria i dig it. the conversations about girl-poo and hypothetical vince vaughn movies have always been what kept me coming back. enjoyable read, sir.
, comment by worm_mcgrupp
worm_mcgrupp Good read... But I have to disagree with you about Mr. Miner's takes on the shows. I do not always agree with his reviews, but he still has valid points IMHO. Also, I believe you are forgetting the Tower Jam, flat bed jam, etc when you say the storage jam was the first time they let us in on what it might be like when they're by themselves...
, comment by RossMG
RossMG @OnlinePhishTour said:
joy is a shitty set closer.
Ahhh the inevitable OPT shit-talking. It's such a constant that I almost miss it when it's not there.
, comment by TennesseeJed
TennesseeJed @fatness1 said:
So with that backhanded slap to all the other reviewers who dissect every note of the show, I am going to flat out state that this was the single best Phish show/experience I personally have ever had.
Gotta love the Phish when they deliver that experience.
, comment by snowbank
snowbank Mr Fatness1,

Thank you for the entertaining account of your SBIX 9 experience. It pleases me to hear about such a peak experience.

One thing that I have learned over the years is that Phish is different things for different people. Some like a well played Bouncin (okay, like three people) and others like a dark abstract jam. Its amazing that Phish can play to such a spectrum of tastes. I think we should take a similar view of those who choose to make their show reviews available to the public.

It is sad to think that someone else's review of the concert would affect your experience. I really hope that it didn't to the extent that one might be lead to believe from your review. You make the case yourself for the subjectivity of the experience of a fish show quite thoroughly. Still, there is a relatively objective place from which we can evaluate a musical performance. I think as phans we need to work at consciously separating the two.

Some phans enjoy picking apart the music. For them, ok me, this enhances the experience. Someone once said on Phishthoughts comments, roughly, 'if the analysis of the music is negatively affecting your experience, stop reading'. From reading your review, I would suggest politely that you may benefit from ignoring those who want to analyze music.

I think your essay does make an interesting point about the overall phish experience. I don't think that it adds anything to the conversation about how or why to review phish shows. I appreciate your concern with reviews but I don't think the problem is with the reviewers. I think the problem is that you are letting it affect your experience. If you want to have a discussion of phish review theory, we are usually willing to have the discussion on Phishthoughts. Just be prepared to express yourself respectfully cause pot shots don't go over well.

Cheers! Hopefully through writing this essay and the attention it has attracted you will be able to enhance your experience. And Don't worry about Mr. Miner. He had a great time at SBIX 9 and loved the storage jam set.
, comment by fatness1
fatness1 Given the entirely unexpected attention that my review has garnered on this site and Phantasy Tour, I suppose now would be a fairly good time to post a Reply Comment. Allow me to make a few points:

1) I wrote my piece before Phish.net even announced there would be an essay contest. I just felt like putting my thoughts to the pad while the weekend was still fresh in my head (and I was woefully bored at work). So let that dispel any notion that I called out Mr. Miner to stir the pot and get attention. But, now that I have yours...

2) I included the paragraph about the Mr. Miner's of the world in response to several posts that I read which stated Phish did not actually play that well at SBIX, i.e., the jams were too short, bla bla bla bla. It was not in response to Mr. Miner's actual review of the show, which I later read, and as it turns out, I thought was pretty dead on. Rather my reference to the Mr. Miner's of the world was to those in general who overly dissect each song's quality and placement during a show and not to him specifically. Lets be honest here, at the end of the day aren't we all following a band that can barely sing?

3) Snowbank, please dont be concerned that my feelings about reviewers are affecting my Phish experience. As discussed in my essay, my experience is made by a mixture of the music, mood, friends, ambiance, weather, sound quality, chemicals, and most importantly, my CMI as a high crotch moisture index can just about ruin any good time. This heatwave in the northeast is not helping.

4) I forgot to include in my essay that I was dropping a bomb in a porta-potty during Big Black Furry Creatures from Mars and in my head was singing over and over again "Big Black Giant Doodies from Craig! Big Black Giant Doodies from Craig!" But my real name is Phil. Or is it?

5) I really hope that I get my goody bag of merchandise from Phish.net. If you are listening, men's size L please! And a women's small for my wife!

6) While I am very excited to see all the activity that my essay has started, today is also a very sad day as I found out that my friends' idea for our movie "Using It" has already been done in the 1982 movie Zapped! starring Scott Baio where he undresses women with his mind. Ugh, the title is even better than mine. F* my life.

Thanks for all the kind words and insults. I've enjoyed them all.
, comment by robertpalmer
robertpalmer unfortunately when you mention someone by name, ie Mr. Miner, you aren't generalizing shit. As for the others responding to the review and calling names, grow up. You've never met the man, why would say something so stupid?
, comment by Lemuria
Lemuria @RabeldyNugs said:
Awesome essay @pzerbo...
As noted in both the headline and body of the story, the essay was posted by @fatness1 in the SBIX Essay Contest.
, comment by snowbank
snowbank @fatness1 - Wow. I think you owe Mr Miner an apology in that case. I would be terribly embarrassed if I referenced someone as the examples of group, criticized that group (though I imagine that your hypothetical questions weren't supposed to be taken negatively, right?) and then thought that person didn't even belong in the group.
, comment by GnarnianRanger
GnarnianRanger @snowbank Owes him an apology!? Please.

Miner publishes his thoughts on the internet. Boo-funkin-hoo if someone disagree and/or calls him out by name. Even if that person is wrong. By publishing his blog he's invited dissent. I'm surprised so many people are on his side on this one. He threw a temper tantrum. On twitter. Who does that?

And what's more, he's the one who acted unprofessionally by misrepresenting the context/nature of the comment that upset him (i.e., a FAN's essay). If anything, he owes an apology it's him to the .net admins for that. I wouldn't hold my breath though.
, comment by GnarnianRanger
GnarnianRanger EDIT: **If anything, it's him who owes an apology to the .net admins for that.

I hate typos.
, comment by EUPhan
EUPhan In my opinion Mr Miner does a great job with his blog and upcoming book and is not a hater at all. He is the exact opposite. phishthoughts.com is the best non-official phish site of 3.0 (after phish.net of course).
, comment by fatness1
fatness1 I think we are all getting very far off topic and need to focus on whats most important- making UsedIt go viral.
, comment by PhishPhils222
PhishPhils222 Great essay man! I hate reading and I made it through the whole thing! Superball was amazing!
, comment by ericwyman
ericwyman Inside here is a really humorous account of the weekend. I get the angle of putting your perspective against the analytical ballyhoo, but did it need it? It sure did create a stir though.
, comment by TennesseeJed
TennesseeJed @ericwyman said:
Inside here is a really humorous account of the weekend.
Agreed. I thought it was hilarious. @fatness1, you have a wonderfully skewed view of life.
, comment by York_Durden
York_Durden This poorly written exercise in scatology and juvenile humor isn't fit to carry Mr. Miner's shaving kit. Who thought this review worthy of publication? When I read a Phish review, I want the note-by-note approach. I don't care where somebody stayed or how often they showered or how much liquor and cigarettes they consumed. Waste of bits.
, comment by batshitcrazy
batshitcrazy Cant we all just get along and make fun of the real enemy, DMB FANS!!!!!
, comment by Dundun
Dundun @York_Durden said:
This poorly written exercise in scatology and juvenile humor isn't fit to carry Mr. Miner's shaving kit. Who thought this review worthy of publication? When I read a Phish review, I want the note-by-note approach. I don't care where somebody stayed or how often they showered or how much liquor and cigarettes they consumed. Waste of bits.
It wasn't a review, it was an essay with SB9 as a subject.

Mr. Miner is probably the most well known phish reviewer today, which I assume is why he was specifically mentioned.

BTW-- I thought the bits about the long list of variables is pretty spot on. I'd like to add a couple to the vector -- hydration level (can't dance if you need a drink), bladder % fullness (I'm about to piss my pants but I can't leave this jam), and the number of people in a 10 foot radius who talk through the jams.
, comment by fatness1
fatness1 BLADDER % FULLNESS! Great call! My neuroses gives me a lot of problems with that one.

, comment by kaptain
kaptain Wow. Excellent.

I am 32. Been to only 4 phish shows, but I am a HUGE fan. I went to about 14 dead shows before August 95. One thing I have noticed about the Phish fan base that separates them from dead fans is that they pack a gnarly snob attitude. Dead fans were all about the moment. When it was over, it was on to the next one.

To all the critics, "can you still have fun?"
, comment by fatness1
fatness1 Amen Kaptain.

And what is the point of a note-by-note review? I dont really care how you "heard" the show - - I'd rather hear it myself. Instead, I want to tell you my experience as a whole and hopefully make you laugh a little, and I want to hear about experience.
, comment by ZatchL
ZatchL Saw the twitter shitstorm, had to check this out. This is really what that's all about? It was a poorly applied comparison (since although the "Mr. Miner's of the World (TM)" DO conduct heavy evals of the music, in this particular case it makes it look like Miner panned SBIX, which he did not) but not at all worth the MeltFest2k11 that resulted. Apologies are definitely NOT owed here, except maybe by Miner for overreacting. If you're a public figure (and in the Phish world Mr. Miner is, like him or not many fans read his reviews) you are going to be criticized, compared to things, and (as here) used as a straw man. Anyway, your review sounds like you had a blast, so cheers phanner.
, comment by easywind111
easywind111 I'm always taking a doody during the best part of the show too. I'm glad I'm not alone.
, comment by Fattyfatfat1
Fattyfatfat1 The author has removed all of the text from their comment
, comment by Goldphishy
Goldphishy Fatness1,

I was reading your review aloud to my 11-year-old son. We're huge phans! We were both enjoying it thoroughly... until we got to the sections about your chafed scrotum sack, bowel movements and twisted sex movie ideas. The content you poured out onto this PUBLIC site is not suitable for most people -- ESPECIALLY AN 11-YEAR-OLD BOY!! Because of you, my son is now constantly paranoid about his "crotch moisture index" and has been refusing to wear pants. Shame on you. Mr. Miner would never have written scatological drivel like this.
You must be logged in to post a comment.


Phish.net

Phish.net is a non-commercial project run by Phish fans and for Phish fans under the auspices of the all-volunteer, non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.

This project serves to compile, preserve, and protect encyclopedic information about Phish and their music.

Credits | Terms Of Use | Legal | DMCA

© 1990-2024  The Mockingbird Foundation, Inc. | Hosted by Linode